
Images
of Women in Classical Greece and Rome
|
In
her essay “From Medusa to Cleopatra: Women in the Ancient World,”
Marilyn Arthur makes a case that both ancient Greece and ancient Rome had
periods of intense patriarchy--which resulted in Greece in some intensely
misogynistic practices--before both societies relaxed their strictures on
women as the result of historical/political forces rather than an
intellectual “Enlightenment.” |
![]() |
| Detail of Plato and
Aristotle from Raphael's School of Athens, 1511. Image from http://www.unesco.org/phiweb/uk/raphael/fresque/f2.html |
Ancient Greece was a highly patriarchal society that became increasingly misogynistic as it underwent change.
Arthur
traces the development of the polis, a kind of democracy within ancient
Greece, which gave men more equal rights--transitioning from an aristocracy
where much power was held by relatively few privileged men--and placed greater
restrictions on women than they had previously known. Arthur explains that as
a middle class arose, the household unit, or oikos, became more
important. The nuclear family, which had previously been only a biological and
social unit, became a political and economic unit.
The functions that women traditionally fulfilled, that of wives and
mothers, became defined as a “necessity and a duty, and the failure to
perform them had legal and moral consequences” (85).Women were prohibited,
according to Arthur, from ever “achieving the status of fully autonomous
beings” (86). A woman
throughout her life was the legal ward of either her father or husband; she
could not inherit property or engage in any but the most small scale business
transactions. The children belonged to the husband, and adultery was seen
as a crime against the state since it corrupted the oikos; a woman
found in an adulterous liaison would lose her citizenship or be executed.
Men also suffered penalties if they committed adultery, but they had
many legal sexual outlets: highly trained courtesans, male and female
prostitutes, and young male citizens. Most Grecian women could not even leave
their homes without permission from their fathers or husbands.
Polly
Radosh, a Sociology professor at Western Illinois University, explains that
many scholars believe that this extreme enforcement of patriarchal values and
the subsequent misogyny was caused by fear and/or distrust.
Women, Radosh explains, appear to have been feared by adult Greek men,
and she points to their marriage relationships and their mythology as evidence
of this fear and distrust. Radosh points out that Greek men did not usually
marry until they were about thirty years old, an age that is rather late
considering life expectancies were about 50 years.
Until they married, young Greek men were typically having sex with boys
or prostitutes until they wanted children.
When they did marry, they chose brides who were 12-15 years old.
The ancient Greek men structured their society, in other words, in such
a way as to ensure that they almost never came into appreciable contact with
adult women.
Arthur
confirms that citizen women were mostly confined to a domestic life, although
they could participate socially in religious ceremonies.
Non-citizens, she explains, had other options.
These women could be part of the hetaira, the highly trained
highly educated courtesans who entertained the male citizens at their parties,
satisfying the men’s intellectual and sexual needs; prostitutes who were
dedicated to relieving the men’s physical/sexual needs; and other
occupations such as weaving, spinning, nursing, midwifery, and retail sales.
Of this era, Arthur explains, “unlike man, the woman of the polis was
regarded as a hybrid creature, a domesticated animal who could be adapted to
the needs of society but whose fundamental instincts were antagonistic to it.
. . . her very existence was a testimony to the gods’ hatred of mankind”
(91).
Arthur concludes her discussion of ancient Greece by referring to the Hellenistic period (323 B.C.E. to 19 B.C.E.). After the Romans conquered them and then after the breakup of the kingdom following Alexander the Great’s death, the population became more aware of their conglomerated nature. There were people of so many different ethnic affiliations that they soon began to think of themselves as “Hellenes,” or Greeks, rather than by identifying with the name of their polis. This led to a centralized pluralism where individualism was allowed to be expressed.
While
still important, the family unit was not the key to citizenship, and so
restrictions upon women eased. Marriage became more of a partnership, treating
each person as an individual autonomous being, and women were able to own
property, hold public professions or positions, and to be citizens.
Additionally, they were allowed greater freedom to worship in religious
settings. Mystery religions and
ecstatic cults that had primarily a female following in the classical world
come to dominate religious life. Isis,
the Egyptian goddess, was imported and assimilated, gradually assuming the
functions of every major divinity. Arthur
summarizes her discussion of the Hellenistic period by saying, “Women were
free to own property, but property ownership no longer led to citizenship;
women were citizens and officials of the polis, but the polis was no longer
the dominant political form; women were no longer a testimony to the god’s
hatred of mankind, but it was the gods who ceased to hate men, not men who
ceased to hate women” (96).
Arthur,
like Radosh, believes mythology to be another source of proof of the fear or
distrust that Grecian men had for women.
Arthur points out that prior to the Hellenistic period, Athena was the
most important goddess. She points out that Athena, although a female
immortal, is not a representative of nor very sympathetic to women.
In fact, she alone was born solely of her father, Zeus--as he swallows
his wife Metis and literally and symbolically gains her powers of
reproduction--and identifies strongly with men, championing male heroes,
engaging in military pursuits, and siding against women in disputes.
Arthur cites this rationale by quoting Athena from Aeschylus’s
Eumenides; Athena says, “There is no mother anywhere who gave me birth,
and, but for marriage, I am always for the male with all my heart, and
strongly on my father’s side” (82). Philosophy instructor C. Stephen
Rhoades has pointed out that this association with males being the creative
force of society is not accidental, that the male mind was seen as the
civilizing and productive force of their society, and Arthur points out that
part of the cultural ideology held that the men were “conquering” nature,
which they clearly identified with the female.
Radosh concurs, mentioning that the myths, which were very important to
their religious rituals, usually identify the world’s evils and society’s
destruction with women. As the culture shifts, however, Arthur explains that
Aphrodite became one of the most important goddesses of the time and was
depicted in many art works as the ideal woman, nude for the first time in
history. Love and partnership are seen as more important during the
Hellenistic period than containing or controlling women.
We
can see that much like in the Egyptian and Hebrew creation stories, the
pattern of female impulses being replaced by males holds true and is perhaps
more severe in those of Ancient Greece.
In
Theogony, Hesiod explains the creation of the universe:
1. The female goddess Earth (Gaia) generates Heaven (Ouranos), and together they produce the Titans. Ouranos tries to prevent the birth of his children by holding them in Gaia’s womb. Gaia arms Kronos, her youngest son, who castrates Ouranos and declares himself ruler of the gods.
2. Kronos and Rhea generate the
Olympian gods. Kronos, fearing his father’s fate, swallows his children as
Rhea brings them forth. She
deceives him, saving her youngest son, Zeus, who eventually tricks Kronos into
vomiting up his swallowed children, Zeus’s siblings.
War ensues, the Olympians win, and Zeus establishes himself as ruler of
the universe.
3.
Zeus and Metis (Intelligence) marry, and Zeus swallows her when she
becomes pregnant. He gains
control over her powers of reproduction.
His first child, Athena, springs from his head, symbolizing the male
dominance of the universe.
Interestingly,
Arthur notes of these stories that all of Zeus’s other children (all female:
Justice, Order, Peace, etc.) signify the beneficence of the female principle when
subjugated to regulation by male authority. Arthur concurs that Hesiod’s
model shows a progression from a world dominated by the generative powers of
the female to one overseen by the moral authority of the male.
Ancient
Rome
Ancient Rome was similar to ancient Greece in that it too began as an aristocracy; however, Marilyn Arthur points out that it was not initially hostile to women and many works of literature from the early republic show that women can and could perform heroic deeds and be active politically and socially in addition to their domestic duties. Still, it was an intensely patriarchal society, as women were strictly regulated, perhaps again because of the emphasis on the home. Roman men had complete authority over their households. Radosh explains that in the fifth century B.C.E. Rome was a republic devoted to war. As a warrior society, it was very successful, and Rome amassed vast land and wealth and conquered many cultures. Their Punic wars lasted 300 years, and by the end they had conquered even classical Greece.
Arthur
points out that in Rome, as the middle class begins to rise and the republic
becomes an empire, women begin to be held to standards similar to those of
ancient Greece. Radosh further explains that in Rome, the society came to be
structured around a concept called paterfamilias, which meant that there
was absolute male control in the family. A
father decided whether his children lived or died; and in an environment where
sons were more prestigious, daughters were routinely put to death or exposed; in
fact, Radosh explains, a family had to be wealthy to raise daughters. Upper
class daughters were named; lower class daughters, if allowed to live, were
numbered. Additionally, men could
kill their wives or daughters if either were found to be unchaste.
Like in Greece, girls married at about 12-15 years old and were not well
educated, instead being prepared for a largely domestic role.
Women had little rights for divorce early in the republic. A man could
return a wife to her family-, but a woman could not initiate one, and a returned
woman became a social outcast. And
like in Assyria, Israel, and Greece, women who were victims of crime were
often held responsible for those crimes. In Rome, if a woman was raped, she
could be put to death by father or husband.
As Arthur concludes her discussion on ancient Rome, she sees that the influence of this risen middle class and the Greek influence do more than just restrict women. She sees that misogynistic literature makes its way into Roman society for the first time. Not only are Greek myths co-opted by the Romans, but their own historians and philosophers begin to depict ideal women as silent, obedient, and submissive, and women who do not adhere to those roles are seen as devious, immoral, and destructive to society. In fact, Tacitus, the historian, and Juvenal, the poet, both attribute the decline in the degeneration of and the corruption within the empire to women.
Course Home Page
| The
Instructor's Homepage | IVCC Homepage
Syllabus
Contact Kimberly M. Radek, the instructor of Women in Literature, at Kimberly_Radek@ivcc.edu
.
This page was last updated on 21 April 2008 . Copyright Kimberly M. Radek, 2001.
